Dear all,
Thomas and me were talking about the feedback we got from the tax office
earlier this week.
Please check the repository for editorial changes pushed in respect to
the feedback.
Furthermore, Thomas rephrased the purpose description of the association
slightly, also, to comply to the reviewer's feedback.
** Does this description still cover everybody's aspects the assoc.
should cover? **
As last point, I included an explicit mention for the purpose the
assoc.'s assets should be used in case of its liquidation. Here we'd
have also the possibility to declare one particular assoc./foundation to
receive RIOT e.V.'s assets.
** Does anybody prefer to go with one particular body (e.g. FSF, ...)?
**
I wish you all a nice weekend and am happy about any feedback provided!
Thomas
p.s.: All who didn't do yet, please join the mailing list and github
repo [1]
[1] https://github.com/RIOT-OS/riotev_articles/invitations
