[riot-devel] Recommendations for Porting RIOT (Ludwig Ortmann)
c.adjih at gmail.com
Tue Apr 30 10:25:20 CEST 2013
Just jumping into the conversation, but:
did you consider using ptrace as a work-around,
if you cannot solve the preemptive scheduler issue ?
Conceptually, it won't be far from being a "virtual machine"
(that's the approach of "User Mode Linux"), and not so elegant,
but I guess with something like "python-ptrace" it might be hacked
together pretty quickly ?
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ludwig Ortmann" <ludwig.ortmann at fu-berlin.de>
To: "RIOT OS kernel developers" <devel at riot-os.org>
Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2013 6:21:26 PM
Subject: Re: [riot-devel] Recommendations for Porting RIOT (Ludwig Ortmann)
On 04/24/2013 02:04 PM, tkennouc at inria.fr wrote:
>> Hi Takai,
>> I was already discussing RIOT ns-3 porting with Daniel Camara from
>> INRIA. He proposed a Google Summer of Code project (1) for this task
>> which I am going to apply for.
>> At the moment I am working on porting RIOT as a UNIX process (the
>> "native" cpu/board).
>> If you still want to know technical details, please say so.
>> Cheers, Ludwig
> Actually I am applying for the same gsoc project. And yes, I'm looking for the
> technical details.
A porting guide is in the makes but not available as of now.
The architecture is relatively clear, though. There is a well defined
set of functions one needs to implement.
You could just look through the native port as it is pretty much bare
bones and self contained at the moment. In fact I'd start with this as a
base for the ns-3 port.
One major problem is delaying this project though:
RIOT has a preemptive scheduler. As of now I haven't been able to find a
way to realize this within a UNIX process. I thought I had with the help
of ucontexts and signal handlers, but it appears that switching back to
interrupted contexts is just not (reliably) possible.
I'm currently looking for a different solution, but it could turn out
that it's plainly impossible.
As for the ns-3 integration, I guess you are in a better position to
judge that since you already did that for contiki.
From what I discussed with Daniel I'd say it should be possible in a
fashion similar to the contiki ns3 port if the scheduler issue is resolved.
Again, just look at the interfaces, it's all there.
devel mailing list
devel at riot-os.org
More information about the devel