[riot-devel] Comments from IRC
oliver.hahm at inria.fr
Mon Oct 13 10:42:45 CEST 2014
> >2014-10-11 15:45:28 corecode my input is: stuff is not tested
> I think we need to differentiate here, some platform code is indeed not
> sufficiently tested (yet). Maybe we can include some information about
> maturity of platforms in the Wiki?
Agreed. I think that's planned for a long time anyway.
> >2014-10-11 15:58:44 corecode use of dINT/eINT or disableIRQ/enableIRQ instead of restoreIRQ
> This is a difficult topic, there are some situations where you explicitly
> have to use 'enableIRQ' instead of 'restoreIRQ'. I think there are also open
> PRs to this issue already.
There's an issue and PRs to fix some usage of the legacy API:
> >2014-10-11 16:00:57 corecode vtimer assumes 4096 seconds is a valid hwtimer value
> no idea, anyone?
Because hwtimer uses 32 bit timestamps. As long as the underlying timer does
not run faster as 1MHz, that sounds like a valid assumption.
printk("NULL POINTER IDIOT\n");
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the devel