[riot-devel] Comments from IRC
oliver.hahm at inria.fr
Mon Oct 13 12:38:13 CEST 2014
> > > >2014-10-11 16:00:57 corecode vtimer assumes 4096 seconds is a valid hwtimer value
> > > no idea, anyone?
> > Because hwtimer uses 32 bit timestamps. As long as the underlying timer does
> > not run faster as 1MHz, that sounds like a valid assumption.
> But this sounds like it does make sense to have it configurable.
I don't understand exactly what should be configurable, but I agree that we
should aim for a different timer architecture/concept for the new release
(after the fall 2014 release).
> Btw: Didn't a related issue also come up in @rousselk's recent timer
printk(KERN_WARNING "Multi-volume CD somehow got mounted.\n");
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the devel