[riot-devel] Open Processes Task Force
kaspar at schleiser.de
Thu May 28 17:15:09 CEST 2015
On 05/28/15 15:59, Emmanuel Baccelli wrote:
> > - introducing a "show-stopper" textual label for comments on PRs
> > (if absent, would require less or no ACK before being merged, after some
> > agreed-upon probation time). The idea would be to increase agility
> > - introducing a "high-impact" label on PRs (would require more
> > ACKs before being merged).
> That's pretty much the idea of the labels "minor" and "major" (impact).
> @Kaspar care to comment? If I remember correctly you saw some use in
> introducing something like the "high-impact" label?
They would do fine. We should but some rough guidelines on when
something is "major" and that it then needs at least two ACKs and an
extended concept review.
More information about the devel