[riot-devel] RIOT Vs Iotivity, AllJoyn, Thread

Baptiste Clenet bapclenet at gmail.com
Wed Jun 8 09:46:31 CEST 2016


Thanks for your answers.
Could we integrate Soletta OIC implementation part as a pkg in RIOT?

2016-06-07 12:58 GMT+02:00 Emmanuel Baccelli <Emmanuel.Baccelli at inria.fr>:

> Hi Gustavo, Hi Ivan,
> ok I see. thanks for your answers.
> That's too bad. It would have been great to gather OIC/OCF people in the
> same room with W3C, IETF and OpenThread people (who are attending the RIOT
> Summit) to discuss various IoT network stack approaches, and various IoT
> open source software approaches. Pitching Intel's approach to IoT in this
> context would also have been a good occasion, in the opinion of many among
> us.
> If there's anything we can do to help you or someone else from your
> community attend/present, let us know.
> Else, maybe next time.
> Cheers,
> Emmanuel
>
> On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 11:26 PM, Gustavo Lima Chaves <
> gustavo.lima.chaves at intel.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> > Sorry, I was under the assumption that this had been settled in private
>> > conversations already, but now I see that's not the case (and the person
>> > involved is not even copied).
>> >
>> > Soletta has an implementation of OIC, the protocol that IoTivity
>> > implements, but there's nothing about AllJoyn or Thread.
>> >
>> > I'm in no position to talk about anything now, so I have to decline the
>> > invitation, but maybe some of the others listed that have been more
>> > involved with Soletta and OIC can respond.
>> >
>> > On Mon, 06 Jun 2016 22:40:34 +0200, Baptiste Clenet wrote:
>> > > Could some of you answer please?
>> > > Thanks
>> > >
>> > > Baptiste
>> > >
>> > > 2016-05-31 17:30 GMT+02:00 Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira at intel.com
>> >:
>> > >
>> > > > Hello Baptiste, Emmanuel
>> > > >
>> > > > I'll let the people more familiar (in cc) with it reply.
>> > > >
>> > > > On terça-feira, 31 de maio de 2016 16:05:22 BRT Emmanuel Baccelli
>> wrote:
>> > > > > Hi Thiago,
>> > > > > basically, we are interested in learning more about it.
>> > > > > And in particular, we were wondering whether it could be a good
>> idea to
>> > > > > present this at the RIOT Summit [1].
>> > > > > What do you think about this idea?
>> > > > > Best,
>> > > > > Emmanuel
>>
>> Oh, sorry, I was also in the private thread (was going to respond
>> soon, but now let's do it here). I have to say that I'm not very
>> comfortable to do a skype-based presentation. Given that the changes
>> of getting funds to travel to the summit are vague now, maybe I'll
>> have to decline as well, unfortunately.
>>
>> [...]
>>
>> > > > > >>>> Hi!
>> > > > > >>>>
>> > > > > >>>> On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 09:16:17AM +0200, Baptiste Clenet
>> wrote:
>> > > > > >>>> > - Iotivity would be great in RIOT, Soletta project [1]
>> imported it
>> > > > > >>>> > for
>> > > > > >>>> > RIOT, I haven't tried it but it seems to work. I think
>> Riot should
>> > > > > >>>>
>> > > > > >>>> have an
>> > > > > >>>>
>> > > > > >>>> > implementation of Iotivity directly in its repo (package)
>> so it
>> > > > will
>> > > > > >>>>
>> > > > > >>>> be
>> > > > > >>>>
>> > > > > >>>> > better maintain.
>>
>> If all of OIC/OCF is to be supported, that's quite a bit of code and
>> using Soletta is a much simpler path.
>>
>> --
>> Gustavo Lima Chaves
>> Intel - Open Source Technology Center
>>
>
>


-- 
Baptiste
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.riot-os.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20160608/292cd20b/attachment.html>


More information about the devel mailing list