[riot-devel] RIOT Vs Iotivity, AllJoyn, Thread

Baptiste Clenet bapclenet at gmail.com
Wed Jun 8 19:58:50 CEST 2016


2016-06-08 17:14 GMT+02:00 Emmanuel Baccelli <Emmanuel.Baccelli at inria.fr>:

> Hi Ivan,
> it would be great to have it as a pkg indeed!
> That's the standard way third-party stacks are integrated in RIOT.
> Looking forward to that,
> Emmanuel
>
> On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 3:41 PM, Iván Briano <ivan.briano at intel.com> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 08 Jun 2016 09:46:31 +0200, Baptiste Clenet wrote:
>> > Thanks for your answers.
>> > Could we integrate Soletta OIC implementation part as a pkg in RIOT?
>> >
>>
>> The OIC implementation is tightly integrated to the core of Soletta, so
>> you need the whole thing in.
>
> Yes but could we find a way to separate it a bit so we can run a OIC
server using GNRC quickly?

I'll look into making sure the pkg and
>> build are in good condition and send it as a pull request.
>>
> Ok thanks, let's see how we can use it with RIOT easily.


>
>> > 2016-06-07 12:58 GMT+02:00 Emmanuel Baccelli <
>> Emmanuel.Baccelli at inria.fr>:
>> >
>> > > Hi Gustavo, Hi Ivan,
>> > > ok I see. thanks for your answers.
>> > > That's too bad. It would have been great to gather OIC/OCF people in
>> the
>> > > same room with W3C, IETF and OpenThread people (who are attending the
>> RIOT
>> > > Summit) to discuss various IoT network stack approaches, and various
>> IoT
>> > > open source software approaches. Pitching Intel's approach to IoT in
>> this
>> > > context would also have been a good occasion, in the opinion of many
>> among
>> > > us.
>> > > If there's anything we can do to help you or someone else from your
>> > > community attend/present, let us know.
>> > > Else, maybe next time.
>> > > Cheers,
>> > > Emmanuel
>> > >
>> > > On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 11:26 PM, Gustavo Lima Chaves <
>> > > gustavo.lima.chaves at intel.com> wrote:
>> > >
>> > >> Hi,
>> > >>
>> > >> > Sorry, I was under the assumption that this had been settled in
>> private
>> > >> > conversations already, but now I see that's not the case (and the
>> person
>> > >> > involved is not even copied).
>> > >> >
>> > >> > Soletta has an implementation of OIC, the protocol that IoTivity
>> > >> > implements, but there's nothing about AllJoyn or Thread.
>> > >> >
>> > >> > I'm in no position to talk about anything now, so I have to
>> decline the
>> > >> > invitation, but maybe some of the others listed that have been more
>> > >> > involved with Soletta and OIC can respond.
>> > >> >
>> > >> > On Mon, 06 Jun 2016 22:40:34 +0200, Baptiste Clenet wrote:
>> > >> > > Could some of you answer please?
>> > >> > > Thanks
>> > >> > >
>> > >> > > Baptiste
>> > >> > >
>> > >> > > 2016-05-31 17:30 GMT+02:00 Thiago Macieira <
>> thiago.macieira at intel.com
>> > >> >:
>> > >> > >
>> > >> > > > Hello Baptiste, Emmanuel
>> > >> > > >
>> > >> > > > I'll let the people more familiar (in cc) with it reply.
>> > >> > > >
>> > >> > > > On terça-feira, 31 de maio de 2016 16:05:22 BRT Emmanuel
>> Baccelli
>> > >> wrote:
>> > >> > > > > Hi Thiago,
>> > >> > > > > basically, we are interested in learning more about it.
>> > >> > > > > And in particular, we were wondering whether it could be a
>> good
>> > >> idea to
>> > >> > > > > present this at the RIOT Summit [1].
>> > >> > > > > What do you think about this idea?
>> > >> > > > > Best,
>> > >> > > > > Emmanuel
>> > >>
>> > >> Oh, sorry, I was also in the private thread (was going to respond
>> > >> soon, but now let's do it here). I have to say that I'm not very
>> > >> comfortable to do a skype-based presentation. Given that the changes
>> > >> of getting funds to travel to the summit are vague now, maybe I'll
>> > >> have to decline as well, unfortunately.
>> > >>
>> > >> [...]
>> > >>
>> > >> > > > > >>>> Hi!
>> > >> > > > > >>>>
>> > >> > > > > >>>> On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 09:16:17AM +0200, Baptiste
>> Clenet
>> > >> wrote:
>> > >> > > > > >>>> > - Iotivity would be great in RIOT, Soletta project [1]
>> > >> imported it
>> > >> > > > > >>>> > for
>> > >> > > > > >>>> > RIOT, I haven't tried it but it seems to work. I think
>> > >> Riot should
>> > >> > > > > >>>>
>> > >> > > > > >>>> have an
>> > >> > > > > >>>>
>> > >> > > > > >>>> > implementation of Iotivity directly in its repo
>> (package)
>> > >> so it
>> > >> > > > will
>> > >> > > > > >>>>
>> > >> > > > > >>>> be
>> > >> > > > > >>>>
>> > >> > > > > >>>> > better maintain.
>> > >>
>> > >> If all of OIC/OCF is to be supported, that's quite a bit of code and
>> > >> using Soletta is a much simpler path.
>> > >>
>> > >> --
>> > >> Gustavo Lima Chaves
>> > >> Intel - Open Source Technology Center
>> > >>
>> > >
>> > >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Baptiste
>>
>
>


-- 
Baptiste
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.riot-os.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20160608/62d315c2/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the devel mailing list