[riot-devel] RIOT Vs Iotivity, AllJoyn, Thread
Emmanuel.Baccelli at inria.fr
Mon May 30 21:07:03 CEST 2016
Thanks for the clarification.
Have you already been in contact personally with Thiago?
It may be interesting if they attend and/or present something on this topic
at the upcoming RIOT Summit .
On May 30, 2016 4:19 PM, "Baptiste Clenet" <bapclenet at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi, I correct what I said, Soletta Project is not an implementation of
> Iotivity but an implementation of OIC specification (Iotivity too) so
> Iotivity and Soletta project can communicate together since they use same
> Intel Open Source is in charge of this project and you can ask
> thiago.macieira at intel.com for more information.
> 2016-05-30 10:41 GMT+02:00 Oleg Hahm <oliver.hahm at inria.fr>:
>> On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 09:16:17AM +0200, Baptiste Clenet wrote:
>> > - Iotivity would be great in RIOT, Soletta project  imported it for
>> > RIOT, I haven't tried it but it seems to work. I think Riot should have
>> > implementation of Iotivity directly in its repo (package) so it will be
>> > better maintain.
>> Very interesting and good to know. I was not aware of this project (and I
>> think most of the RIOT maintainers weren't either). And yes, for
>> maintainability a package in RIOT might make sense. We just need a
>> willing to do so. ;-)
>> Baptiste, do you know the people behind Soletta?
>> printk("Entering UltraSMPenguin Mode...\n");
>> devel mailing list
>> devel at riot-os.org
> devel mailing list
> devel at riot-os.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the devel