[riot-devel] RIOT Vs Iotivity, AllJoyn, Thread

Emmanuel Baccelli Emmanuel.Baccelli at inria.fr
Tue May 31 16:05:22 CEST 2016


Hi Thiago,
basically, we are interested in learning more about it.
And in particular, we were wondering whether it could be a good idea to
present this at the RIOT Summit [1].
What do you think about this idea?
Best,
Emmanuel


[1] summit.riot-os.org

On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 3:52 PM, Baptiste Clenet <bapclenet at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Not really but I saw him answering some post on Iotivity and Soletta
> project for people asking to port Iotivity to constraint object.
>
> Thiago, could you explain Soletta Project and the relation with OIC and
> RIOT please?
>
> 2016-05-30 21:07 GMT+02:00 Emmanuel Baccelli <Emmanuel.Baccelli at inria.fr>:
>
>> Hi Baptiste,
>>
>> Thanks for the clarification.
>>
>> Have you already been in contact personally with Thiago?
>>
>> It may be interesting if they attend and/or present something on this
>> topic at the upcoming RIOT Summit [1].
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Emmanuel
>>
>> [1] summit.riot-os.org
>> On May 30, 2016 4:19 PM, "Baptiste Clenet" <bapclenet at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi, I correct what I said, Soletta Project is not an implementation of
>>> Iotivity but an implementation of OIC specification (Iotivity too) so
>>> Iotivity and Soletta project can communicate together since they use same
>>> specification.
>>>
>>> Intel Open Source is in charge of this project and you can ask
>>> thiago.macieira at intel.com for more information.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>> 2016-05-30 10:41 GMT+02:00 Oleg Hahm <oliver.hahm at inria.fr>:
>>>
>>>> Hi!
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 09:16:17AM +0200, Baptiste Clenet wrote:
>>>> > - Iotivity would be great in RIOT, Soletta project [1] imported it for
>>>> > RIOT, I haven't tried it but it seems to work. I think Riot should
>>>> have an
>>>> > implementation of Iotivity directly in its repo (package) so it will
>>>> be
>>>> > better maintain.
>>>>
>>>> Very interesting and good to know. I was not aware of this project (and
>>>> I
>>>> think most of the RIOT maintainers weren't either). And yes, for
>>>> maintainability a package in RIOT might make sense. We just need a
>>>> maintainer
>>>> willing to do so. ;-)
>>>>
>>>> Baptiste, do you know the people behind Soletta?
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Oleg
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> printk("Entering UltraSMPenguin Mode...\n");
>>>>         linux-2.2.16/arch/sparc64/kernel/smp.c
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> devel mailing list
>>>> devel at riot-os.org
>>>> https://lists.riot-os.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Baptiste
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> devel mailing list
>>> devel at riot-os.org
>>> https://lists.riot-os.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>>>
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> devel mailing list
>> devel at riot-os.org
>> https://lists.riot-os.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Baptiste
>
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list
> devel at riot-os.org
> https://lists.riot-os.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.riot-os.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20160531/51d5268f/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the devel mailing list