[riot-devel] RIOT Vs Iotivity, AllJoyn, Thread

Thiago Macieira thiago.macieira at intel.com
Tue May 31 17:30:01 CEST 2016


Hello Baptiste, Emmanuel

I'll let the people more familiar (in cc) with it reply.

On terça-feira, 31 de maio de 2016 16:05:22 BRT Emmanuel Baccelli wrote:
> Hi Thiago,
> basically, we are interested in learning more about it.
> And in particular, we were wondering whether it could be a good idea to
> present this at the RIOT Summit [1].
> What do you think about this idea?
> Best,
> Emmanuel
> 
> 
> [1] summit.riot-os.org
> 
> On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 3:52 PM, Baptiste Clenet <bapclenet at gmail.com>
> 
> wrote:
> > Not really but I saw him answering some post on Iotivity and Soletta
> > project for people asking to port Iotivity to constraint object.
> > 
> > Thiago, could you explain Soletta Project and the relation with OIC and
> > RIOT please?
> > 
> > 2016-05-30 21:07 GMT+02:00 Emmanuel Baccelli <Emmanuel.Baccelli at inria.fr>:
> >> Hi Baptiste,
> >> 
> >> Thanks for the clarification.
> >> 
> >> Have you already been in contact personally with Thiago?
> >> 
> >> It may be interesting if they attend and/or present something on this
> >> topic at the upcoming RIOT Summit [1].
> >> 
> >> Cheers,
> >> 
> >> Emmanuel
> >> 
> >> [1] summit.riot-os.org
> >> 
> >> On May 30, 2016 4:19 PM, "Baptiste Clenet" <bapclenet at gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> Hi, I correct what I said, Soletta Project is not an implementation of
> >>> Iotivity but an implementation of OIC specification (Iotivity too) so
> >>> Iotivity and Soletta project can communicate together since they use
> >>> same
> >>> specification.
> >>> 
> >>> Intel Open Source is in charge of this project and you can ask
> >>> thiago.macieira at intel.com for more information.
> >>> 
> >>> Cheers,
> >>> 
> >>> 2016-05-30 10:41 GMT+02:00 Oleg Hahm <oliver.hahm at inria.fr>:
> >>>> Hi!
> >>>> 
> >>>> On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 09:16:17AM +0200, Baptiste Clenet wrote:
> >>>> > - Iotivity would be great in RIOT, Soletta project [1] imported it
> >>>> > for
> >>>> > RIOT, I haven't tried it but it seems to work. I think Riot should
> >>>> 
> >>>> have an
> >>>> 
> >>>> > implementation of Iotivity directly in its repo (package) so it will
> >>>> 
> >>>> be
> >>>> 
> >>>> > better maintain.
> >>>> 
> >>>> Very interesting and good to know. I was not aware of this project (and
> >>>> I
> >>>> think most of the RIOT maintainers weren't either). And yes, for
> >>>> maintainability a package in RIOT might make sense. We just need a
> >>>> maintainer
> >>>> willing to do so. ;-)
> >>>> 
> >>>> Baptiste, do you know the people behind Soletta?
> >>>> 
> >>>> Cheers,
> >>>> Oleg
> >>>> 
> >>>> --
> >>>> printk("Entering UltraSMPenguin Mode...\n");
> >>>> 
> >>>>         linux-2.2.16/arch/sparc64/kernel/smp.c
> >>>> 
> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>> devel mailing list
> >>>> devel at riot-os.org
> >>>> https://lists.riot-os.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
> >>> 
> >>> --
> >>> Baptiste
> >>> 
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> devel mailing list
> >>> devel at riot-os.org
> >>> https://lists.riot-os.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
> >> 
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> devel mailing list
> >> devel at riot-os.org
> >> https://lists.riot-os.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
> > 
> > --
> > Baptiste
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > devel mailing list
> > devel at riot-os.org
> > https://lists.riot-os.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


-- 
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
  Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center



More information about the devel mailing list