[riot-notifications] [RIOT] c++: Define some support functions required by GCC (#3107)

Joseph Noir notifications at github.com
Mon Jun 1 00:38:01 CEST 2015

I can live with using an atomic implementation that works for most (or all) devices. If that is using C for atomics, so be it.

However, did I understand your later comments correctly, i.e., #3115 can offer the missing atomic calls to allow the usage of the C++ atomic header (which would be much nicer fix and lead to better C++ support)?

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.riot-os.org/pipermail/notifications/attachments/20150531/4f406b3b/attachment.html>

More information about the notifications mailing list