[riot-notifications] [RIOT-OS/RIOT] drivers/include: add header definition for wdt (#11527)
notifications at github.com
Fri Jun 28 14:12:23 CEST 2019
> Each individual two bytes (in this case it would be at least 4 on ARM) really do not matter. But all the hundreds of times we decide to not care do add up. In the end, there's kilobytes of "n<$much bytes do not matter" in the final binary.
In that case I think `wdt_stop` should also be guarded.
> I think it is. Would it make sense to get implementation experience first? IIRC there are two wdt implementations "in the queue". Are they close to implementing this PR?
I adapted my PR.
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the notifications