[riot-notifications] [RIOT-OS/RIOT] [RFC] Definition of `PSEUDOMODULES` in `Makefile.include` of drivers (#10577)

Francisco notifications at github.com
Thu Jan 14 09:56:22 CET 2021

> @aabadie @fjmolinas According to `CODEOWNERS.md` in PR #13289 it seems that you are responsible for the make build system wink Is there something like that discussed in this issue on the ToDo-List?

I'm not really the build system maintainer, but that being said declaring `PSEUDOMODULES` in `$RIOTBASE/drivers/<driver>/Makefile.include` as long as `PSEUDOMODULES` are declarative there would be no issue with that approach. Its definitively possible.

> Would it be reasonable and of course possible to include a $RIOTBASE/drivers/<driver>/Makefile.include in which the pseudomodules a driver supports are defined?

So Yes, possible, and yes reasonable as long as kept declarative.

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.riot-os.org/pipermail/notifications/attachments/20210114/d97050ec/attachment.htm>

More information about the notifications mailing list