[riot-notifications] [RIOT-OS/RIOT] drivers/at86rf215: add function to signal setup finished (#16921)

José Alamos notifications at github.com
Thu Sep 30 16:11:06 CEST 2021

> I'm not so excited about replacing a generic function with a driver specific one.
Maybe netdev_register() could call the callback instead?

I think on one side this is actually a use case where a dedicated function can be desirable.

For the use case of this test (clock configuration and trimming) you will need to call driver specific code and therefore, include driver headers. Then, a generic function wouldn't help because the driver specific function could have been call in the beginning.

On the other side, calling it from `netdev_register` makes it easier to maintain because there's only one point.

How do you think it should be handled?

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.riot-os.org/pipermail/notifications/attachments/20210930/f8d4a00f/attachment-0001.htm>

More information about the notifications mailing list