[riot-users] Switch to BSD?
Emmanuel.Baccelli at inria.fr
Tue Jan 27 21:12:32 CET 2015
this thread has been silent since new year's break.
Has anyone changed his/her mind on the topic in the mean time?
Else, here's a tentative summary on where we are at, so far, in terms of
- a few have stated their enthusiasm for MIT/BSD
- a few have stated their enthusiasm for (L)GPL
- the vast majority is less enthusiastic to either direction but could
approve a switch to MIT, for pragmatic reasons
Is that fair enough, in a nutshell?
On a related topic, concerning the technical feasibility of LGPL licensing
I assume you have all seen this proposal
which is the first attempt at a practical guide to proprietary code in RIOT.
Any comments on this in the context of the license discussion?
On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 10:59 PM, Emmanuel Baccelli <
Emmanuel.Baccelli at inria.fr> wrote:
> Dear RIOTers,
> we have been receiving an increasing amount of negative feedback from
> various companies concerning the practical usability of our LGPL license in
> their context, being a show-stopper.
> For this reason, INRIA, Freie Universitaet (FU) Berlin and Hamburg
> University of Applied Science (HAW) are currently considering changing the
> license of their contributions to RIOT to a less restrictive license (i.e.
> BSD, potentially as soon as next release).
> Such a switch to BSD is betting that the effect of a potentially smaller
> percentage of user/devel contributing back to the master branch will be
> dwarfed by the effect of a user/devel community growing much bigger and
> quicker. This seems doable considering the current momentum around RIOT.
> In a second phase, if such a license switch takes place for INRIA/FU/HAW
> contributions, we would then contact other contributors individually, to
> check their status concerning a similar switch for their own contributions.
> But in the first place, we would like to debate this topic. In particular:
> is anyone violently opposing the idea of migrating to a less restrictive
> license, such as BSD? If so, why? On the other hand, if you explicitly
> support the license change, feel free to indicate this as well. Please send
> your opinion to the list before Dec. 10th.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the users