[riot-users] ifconfig 9 add a02:8109:b6bf:bb24:0292::1 doesn't work
mail at martine-lenders.eu
Tue Oct 29 09:53:40 CET 2019
RIOT should have no problems with longer prefixes than 64 bits for global
addresses. I noticed however in the past (when configuring my home network
without RIOT), that Linux can be a bit difficult with that.
Please try configuring the default route first, however.
Am Di., 29. Okt. 2019 um 09:43 Uhr schrieb Philipp Blum <
philipp-blum at jakiku.de>:
> Hi Martine,
> I use the nrf52dk. 6LoWPAN over BLE (adoption layer). Nimble. It's a
> simple tree. root is connected to my Notebook and the other nodes to the
> root. I already configured RPL with ifconfig 9 add 2001:db8::1. This works
> fine. But I would like to use another global address and /80 not /64.
> - Did you configure the default route on your RPL root back to your
> Not yet. I give it a try and configure this first.
> I, more or less, followed this guide
> It worked fine with a /64 range.
> best regards
> Am 2019-10-29 09:13, schrieb Martine Lenders:
> Hi Philipp,
> I'm not one 100% sure about the setup.
> - Which boards are you using for RIOT or are you using native?
> - How is the RIOT instance connected to your notebook? Via ethos, CDC-ECM,
> Ethernet, ...?
> - Did you configure the default route on your RPL root back to your laptop?
> Best regards,
> Am Mo., 28. Okt. 2019 um 23:15 Uhr schrieb Philipp Blum <
> philipp-blum at jakiku.de>:
>> Let's say my network interface on my notebook has the following IP:
>> This means I got a02:8109:b6bf:bb24::/64 for my network. Got this range
>> from my ISP.
>> I want to configure my RPL network to have a02:8109:b6bf:bb24:0292::/80
>> as the IPv6 range.
>> So I used the following command:
>> ifconfig 9 add a02:8109:b6bf:bb24:0292::1/80
>> I also tried the following:
>> ifconfig 9 add a02:8109:b6bf:bb24:0292::1
>> Both doesn't respond with a success message.
>> The basic idea: I add this route to my Notebook and the router to be able
>> to route the packages to the correct location.
>> Is this a bug or do I understand something wrong about the IPv6 routing?
>> users mailing list
>> users at riot-os.org
> users mailing list
> users at riot-os.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the users